It is useful to remember that history is to the nation as memory is to the individual…” Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr. ‘s phrase cuts straight to the bone. Opening a portal to the past, his profound words land like a quiet warning, reminding us that a nation, just like a person, becomes disoriented without a clear conception of its past, stumbling into the future blind. How then does society look for its origin? Where do our social, political, and cultural realities emerge from? What shapes our judgments, our lineage, and our collective sense of belonging? Quite ironically, the answer lies behind us, in the past.
Fragments of that past live in what we call archives: crumbling manuscripts, fading photographs, brittle film reels, and voices trapped on magnetic tape. Each piece is irreplaceable. Each one holds evidence of who we were, what we believed, and how we survived. Safeguarding these are ‘archived buildings,’ storing and protecting the integrity of these records. Holding the country’s most deep-seated stories, these specialized facilities breathe of history.
These monumental buildings, however, did not emerge overnight from an administrative decision. Long before ‘archive’ became a formal term, India was already tracking its truths. Shaped by empires and egos, the practice started creeping in from the Mughal dynasty under the reign of Akbar when he ran the Daftar Khana, a meticulous record storage office that tracked everything from his tax collections to military campaigns.
Following this paper trail, regional powers throughout the country kept their own ledgers, their own truths. Everyone wanted proof. Everyone wanted their version locked in. Then came the British, drowning India in its bureaucracy and turning record-keeping into an industry. The East India Company and the Raj collectively generated so much paperwork that a central repository became inevitable. First Calcutta, then with the change in capital, Delhi. They called it the Imperial Records Department. Shedding its colonial name post-independence, this building as we know it today is the National Archives of India. Today the NAI is just one formal guardian of our records.
Across the country dozens of institutions run by either governments, private trusts, cultural organizations, or community groups continue to activate our documentary heritage. Together these institutions form a network of distributed memory that no single institution can ever hold. Shaping this ecosystem. Architecture presents various typologies, creating different privacy levels for each of these buildings where citizens learn to care for fragile memory. At their core, archives do three things that no other institution can replicate. Firstly, they protect rights. Land titles, citizenship records, and legislative histories are all evidence that people need to claim what’s theirs and to hold power accountable.
Secondly, they anchor research. From historians to lawyers to urban planners, they all return to archives when contemporary sources fail them. Policies that control us do not just emerge from thin air; they are built on precedent, precedent that archives store. Lastly, they preserve identity. Oral narratives fade. Languages die. Although a recorded folk song, a photographed ritual, and a documented speech survive. They may be moved around physically, but they do survive. Archives are what give intangible events a chance for survival. Losing these archives is to lose our ability to progress. Yet, preserving them is not easy.
A country as vast and diverse as ours faces innumerable challenges. Space is finite, compelling archivists to make hard choices about what stays and what vanishes from history. Selection bias hardens upkeep, and someone’s history always loses. Marginalized communities and dissenting voices are systematically under-recorded or erased entirely. Under the tangled lattice of copyright and cataloging systems, archives have an access barrier from the very public they’re meant to serve. Layered onto this are India’s structural hurdles. State archives occupy aging buildings where monsoons and pollution wage war on paper.
Termites and mold are as much a threat as government neglect. Trained conservators are scarce, and though digitalization tries its best to push us forward, forward, outdated equipment and insufficient budgets are there to keep the catapult pulled back. Still, despite all odds, several institutions, both government-controlled and independently supported, have become anchors of Indian memory. Transcending their functions, some buildings are becoming landmarks that shape how we perceive the fragments of heritage itself.
Based on a combination of factors such as architecture, scope of collections, and impact on public engagement, the following ten buildings call for your attention. They are actively reinterpreting the past by offering multiple entry points into India’s layered identity. Together, these represent a spectrum: from state-run organizations to independent cultural centers, from colonial-era monuments to contemporary architectural experiments.
Designed by Lutyens in 1926, this neoclassical colossus remains South Asia’s largest archival complex. Inside, millions of government records trace the arc from colonial extraction to postcolonial bureaucracy. This is where policy is born and buried, where historians unearth the trail of partition, emergency, and economic liberalization.
Set inside Teen Murti House, this building holds the private papers of India’s freedom fighters and post-independence leaders: letters, diaries, and photographs that reveal the messy and vulnerable human side of nation-building. This is where ideology meets biography, where Nehru’s vision collides with ground-level politics.
A marble monument to a living empire, now functioning as one of India’s largest museums with 25 galleries spanning paintings, manuscripts, and artifacts. Its gardens and galleries offer layered narratives, colonialism, resistance, and urban heritage, all coexisting in uncomfortable proximity. The archive forces visitors to reckon with power’s architectural legacy.
Inside the grand 19th-century Town Hall, neoclassical pillars frame rare books, maps, and manuscripts that shaped Western India’s intellectual evolution. It functions as part library, part museum, part civic conscience, and part archive, where Mumbai’s cultural DNA sits preserved in ink.
Originally the Victoria & Albert Museum (1872), this restored civic gem houses decorative arts, maps, and artifacts that chart Mumbai’s cultural evolution. It’s a rare example of colonial infrastructure repurposed for postcolonial storytelling where industrial design meets vernacular craft and urban planning reveals itself through archival objects.
Charles Correa’s architectural landmark functions as a living archive, with galleries, libraries, and performance spaces celebrating Rajasthan’s arts, crafts, music, and theatre. Contemporary expression and historical tradition occupy the same physical space, challenging the notion that archives must be static.
India’s cinematic memory survives here; thousands of film reels, posters, scripts, and stills sit rescued from decay. Restoration labs and climate-controlled vaults fight against decomposition and degradation. Without NFAI, entire decades of regional cinema would vanish, taking with them dialects, costumes, and social commentary that mainstream narratives ignore.
The Salar Jung family’s private obsession became public treasure: art from Europe, Asia, and India spanning sculptures, textiles, and manuscripts. This museum bridges dynastic wealth and democratic access, offering a panoramic view of global artistic traditions through a Deccani lens. It’s a showcase of how a private legacy becomes a national inheritance.
Over 20,000 Arabic and Persian manuscripts, including illuminated Qurans and Mughal miniatures, make this one of South Asia’s most vital centers for Indo-Islamic scholarship. Established in the late 19th century, it preserves intellectual traditions that colonial and postcolonial archives often marginalized. The collection reframes subcontinental history beyond Hindu-Muslim binaries.
Text Description by Jigisha Soni
Tate Studio began with an unassuming warehouse in Calicut, a city that is expanding while holding on to its design thinking and practical character. What once served as a storage shell has been reshaped into a furniture showroom and experience centre, proving how restraint and reinvention can bring new life to existing structures. Design Thinking […]
Brutalism is an architectural style from the 50s and 60s that began in the United Kingdom. Brutalist Architecture can be elaborated as raw with no ornamentation and exposed building materials used in a monolithic way. Majorly showcasing the concrete in its raw beauty employed in various geometric shapes. Since the beginning of the revolutionary composite […]